Alabama – Separation of Church and State – Violation – Invoking “God”

It seems we have a judicial member, a very senior member who seems to have not performed well in law school.

This Alabama Judge (Tom Parker) should be removed (finally) from the bench with his IVF ruling disqualified. Why you ask?

So glad you asked. It is because, as far as many of the rest of us know, there is “supposed” to be an EXPLICITLY clear delineation between adding personal religious beliefs into political and state business, activities and laws.

Passing a law, one with ‘personal’ beliefs in a mythical god is not legal.

  • Please read the entire piece before you start screaming that I am a heathen, please… While I am a heathen, I am a good person – that should be that is required to be a good human in a ‘good’ society.

Now, if you do believe in a god or another mythical figure such as Zeus, Mohammed, Shiva – that is up to you and your life forming beliefs. “You” can enjoy whatever religion you choose – you however, cannot just force the rest of us to believe in any of them. For many of us, ‘SCIENCE’ and ‘LOGIC’ is our life force and our continual path into the future.

Since centuries behind us, many humans on Earth have:

  1. stopped believing that the world was flat  
  2. completely denied the existence of dragons in the oceans  
  3. believed that BOOKS, the printed word (science, math, logic, literature [freely expressed literature]), was a great thing and what we needed to progress – better than a bible full of beliefs
  4. believed that equality, not just mouthing the word, that full blown equality for everyone – women, people of different races, from different countries – that is the path forward

Injecting religion into politics and state and law is forcing those who are:

  • Humanist
  • Agnostic
  • Athiest
  • Non-believer – well, you can add more of your own categories to the list here

to kow-tow to something they just do not believe in. That is not the way – such as forcing all non-believers to suck it up and live with the phrase “In god we trust” on American currency and in some court rooms. Laws are supposed to be in place to protect everyone, not just a subset of people on earth to make them feel good because they can say “hey, god is with us” or “god protects us” or “god saves us”. But – for an embryo, an unborn child – a non-breathing pile of tissue – a non-thinking cellular glob where everything it does is autonomic… An embryo is not a lifeform, get it – ‘not a life’ yet.

You, we, all of us – we have to start using commonsense and logic, not just belief. To refer to an embryo and state “All human beings bear the image of God” – where is the logic and science in that statement…? Parker has been referring to law and religion for most of his career (most of us do not know how long since we do not know this individual). Parker is relying on the book of Genesis.

For legal reasoning, who was the author of Genesis – someone that is an expert in law? Can that be authenticated?

Or is the Genesis author that Parker continually refers to, a definitively identified higher being with bona fides that is just out there in the cosmos stating law from his/her own mouth. Sure, people talk about changing water to wine and his prodigy waking up and coming out of a cave but that is all hearsay. And if it did happen, no one can prove that alchemy (changing lead to gold, water to wine, etc.) has ever occurred in the human lifespan.

Here is the kicker, as more people learn science and technology, they tend to believe less in religion and mythical beings. During the first couple of decades of my life, I heard nothing but this statement, “the earth is 6,000 years old.” That completely stopped being the religious mantra being put out into the public hemisphere as more and MORE science discovered older and older life on this rock we call earth. And science is ‘still’ continuing to find older civilizations and lifeforms.

So, are we starting to devolve back into a nation (world) where the religious fancy is going to take hold again and overrule science and logic.

Lastly, where was your god during the:

  • Holocaust,
  • Slavery,
  • World War I, II, Vietnam,
  • the Japanese horrific attack on Nanjing (Nanking),
  • soldiers of America slaughtering Indigenous Natives.

—- where was your god then?

What about when:

  • the Chinese communist party were/are wiping out the Uyghurs culture, incarcerating them, cutting their hair and beards, taking over their physical properties by imminent domain and razing them to the ground and lastly performing a mass indoctrination to force them to stop believing in their own Uyghur ways and follow the Chinese Communist Party brainwash processes
  • on October 7th, Hamas terrorists invaded Israel — to kill and rape and kidnap AND gang rape and THEN kill girls and women and definitely, DEFINITELY do not forget about the babies that were decapitated…. (NOTE: All the Palestinians had to do to stop all this current conflict — give up the Hamas terrorists — the current state of Israeli soldiers in Gaza would have been over months ago).

—- where was your god…?

What about:

  • the Africa Rwandan genocide that took place in Rwanda – where the Hutu performed their massacre of the Tutsi’s…?
  • little incident in Tulsa, OK, on Black Wall Street, where the white mobs massacred/murdered ~300 progressive/successful blacks – destroyed all the black family homes and stores in the process – eh?
  • Females – full rights and equality (work, pay, life)
  • Blacks and Native Americans – full rights and equality – with none of the ‘one drop of colored blood makes one a #$*@*_r ‘ word?

—- where was/is your god?

And let’s not forget – where was your god during our most recent pandemic, where MILLIONS of people around the world suffered horrifically or died…?

If there is a god, an almighty, all-powerful entity – do you not believe he/she/it would have stepped up to stop the loss of life…? And please, do not go down that rosy red rabbit hole of “well, he/she/it was weaning out the weak and making it better for the rest of humanity.”

Mar 13 add-on: a woman raised a point on this article:

"If they do go by their Scripture, the quote is "the BREATH of Life". That's when Life starts per their own beatitudes: with the first breath ~ and yes
WHAT ABOUT SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE?!!!"
Yes, that is what many of us believe in - that first breath...

We just have too many people refusing logic and science. Instead, focusing solely (or primarily) on religion and faith. Which, to me, keeps coming back to so many centuries of:
a) flat earth
b) dragons at the edge of the world
c) Aristotle being chastised for stating the Earth revolves around the Sun and not the other way around
d) being gay is an abomination (I'm not gay or bi-sexual and I see nothing wrong with that - that is up to any and ALL LBTGQ individuals to live life as they wish to enjoy it)
e) religious leaders (pastors, reverends, mega-church talkers) all saying do as their 'god' says, while in the meantime, they are in the back room with another woman (or same-sex with a 'guy') or stealing money for a mega-yacht or doing drugs...
f) forcing women (certain parts of the world) to wear clothing to cover their entire body (hijab and whatnot) or to ALWAYS have to be escorted by some male member of their family when going out in public.


While all in all, many of these religious believers are not looking at the big picture and the future of humanity - being progressive for all and doing better.
Such as:
* Helping the not well-to-do start doing better.
* Getting rid of racist, sexist discrimination...
* Removing the taint of "my religion is better than your religion" (sunni vs the shias - catholics vs protestants, etc....)

But no, they wish to focus on and follow one of their gods out there.
Like me believing in Zeus and following his lead - but I know that the 'god' Zeus does not exist, therefore, I focus on those around me.
So, if this is what folks choose to do in their daily lives, it is up to them to how their life is dictated, not us. However, please, do not allow your belief to get 'you' to try to convince the rest of us to believe in a god, any god. Science, for many of us - moved us on to a better, clear eyed path….

Apologies for the long, little soliloquy there, I just get a bit teed off when folks try to bring religion back to the forefront in our daily lives and attempt to jam it down the throats of all the science/logical thinking members living on this now small planet...

SHAME! Working Mothers DESERVE BETTER Support from Employers

I am a working male.

I am not a parent but I have been a step-parent for new-borne twins to teenagers.

I have multiple degrees – and there are many, MANY women out there with NO degrees or more degrees who are smarter than me (I’m also a former Marine so I am not afraid of making that kind of statement.)

But yet, even I do not understand why is it SO DIFFICULT for employers to support their employees better – specifically working mothers.

YES. We get it that customers are number one.

But, companies, businesses, agencies, organizations, whatever they call themselves – companies HAVE TO treat working mothers BETTER in this time of a pandemic. There is just no better recourse. It is the RIGHT THING TO DO!

And jiminy crickets here – I do not mean to get on a high horse or anything but how many times are any of us going to live through a pandemic…??

This pandemic might take a year or two and businesses will have to support their employees working from home (or even maybe bringing a child in to work).

Working mothers already suffer from ignorant, or non-diverse, or sexist male employees – why would any business want to tack on another enormous burden that a woman cannot work from home taking care of children…????

Why would any:

  • employer want to punish or fire a working mom who is/was doing a GREAT job?
  • forward-thinking company want to remove a working mom, causing her and her family to lose that income and rely on the city/state
    • which in turn causes more budgetary problems for that city/state
    • which in turn causes more businesses to fail because there are more individuals out of work, specifically WORKING MOMS
      • You can extrapolate and work out the direction this is going
  • employer choose to be unempathetic and tell a working mom, she cannot take work now, at this time, because she is taking care of a child?

We have had working mothers do FANTASTIC jobs for decades (and much more) in other pandemics and Great War and World Wars!!!

So, employers, what are you going to do?  Are you going to:

  • hire another woman without children (which is discrimination) to take over the job the working mom was doing…? 
    • And then cross your fingers and hope that the “new” employee will not get pregnant and have children….
  • NOT hire women (which is also discrimination) during the pandemic and only hire men…? (I would hope other ‘men’ out there would also stand up and against this kind of practice.)

Employers, why can’t you support your already hard working successful working moms and tell customers AND business partners that YOU CARE for your working moms…?

Or better yet, be positive and make your customers and partners allies in this time of CoViD and urge them to support YOUR support of working moms?

  • This could be a magic bullet in growing more business when customers see that you ACTUALLY do care about topics like supporting working moms.

How hard is this?

HOW HARD IS IT? Wake up, please…

This pandemic is likely to take another year for the world to get into any kind of semblance of control.

What happened to diversity, equality and successful collaboration between all individuals of a business?

What happened to the strategy and strategic outlook for any business at this time – especially if you cause attrition and turnover (which is expensive) by belittling, humiliating and firing working mothers…?

We, as members of humanity, were supposed to be on a better path of greatness and growth at the start of this century, or better yet, at the start of this decade…